<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 614 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411036</link>
    <description>The Appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the Application by the former Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was upheld. The Authority found the claim for professional fees was not maintainable as the professionals had not authorized it, and the Application was filed belatedly after the Resolution Plan approval. The Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding statutory authority under the IBC and engagement of professionals without authorization were rejected. The Appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 614 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411036</link>
      <description>The Appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the Application by the former Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was upheld. The Authority found the claim for professional fees was not maintainable as the professionals had not authorized it, and the Application was filed belatedly after the Resolution Plan approval. The Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding statutory authority under the IBC and engagement of professionals without authorization were rejected. The Appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>