<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules 50% Property Addition Unjustified; Payment Made Solely by Assessee&#039;s Husband in Co-Ownership Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59220</link>
    <description>Investment in immovable property - co-ownership - 50% addition - the entire payment of sale consideration of flat in dispute was paid by the husband of assessee - additions in the hand of the assessee is not justified - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:14:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:14:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules 50% Property Addition Unjustified; Payment Made Solely by Assessee&#039;s Husband in Co-Ownership Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59220</link>
      <description>Investment in immovable property - co-ownership - 50% addition - the entire payment of sale consideration of flat in dispute was paid by the husband of assessee - additions in the hand of the assessee is not justified - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:14:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>