<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 19 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26285</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue regarding the determination of deductible expenditure under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77. The court also held that premiums paid on an insurance policy were not considered a perquisite under section 40A(5)(a) of the Act. Consequently, the court decided in favor of the assessee on both issues, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 19 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26285</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue regarding the determination of deductible expenditure under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77. The court also held that premiums paid on an insurance policy were not considered a perquisite under section 40A(5)(a) of the Act. Consequently, the court decided in favor of the assessee on both issues, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>