https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296999 Partial rejection of a plaint was treated as impermissible because the relevant civil procedure provision contemplated rejection only when its full requirements were not met, not rejection of part of the plaint alone. The plaintiff was to proceed to trial on the framed issues, with the claim to be tested on evidence and decided on merits if unproved. Where final disposal of the disputed relief depended on findings about the land boundaries, extent, and alleged excess area, the matter required further evidence, and issues 1 and 4 were remanded to the trial court for fresh findings. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 1907 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:46:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296999 Partial rejection of a plaint was treated as impermissible because the relevant civil procedure provision contemplated rejection only when its full requirements were not met, not rejection of part of the plaint alone. The plaintiff was to proceed to trial on the framed issues, with the claim to be tested on evidence and decided on merits if unproved. Where final disposal of the disputed relief depended on findings about the land boundaries, extent, and alleged excess area, the matter required further evidence, and issues 1 and 4 were remanded to the trial court for fresh findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Feb 1907 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296999