<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (9) TMI 60 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297000</link>
    <description>A single plaint cannot be rejected in part under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, even where it contains multiple causes of action or challenges several alienations; if rejection is justified, it must operate on the plaint as a whole. The contrary view permitting partial rejection was held erroneous. A review petition against the order rejecting the plaint was examined under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and found not maintainable on the stated facts, so its dismissal was upheld. The order allowing only partial rejection was set aside, and the suit was left to proceed in accordance with the rule that plaint rejection cannot be fragmented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:46:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (9) TMI 60 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297000</link>
      <description>A single plaint cannot be rejected in part under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, even where it contains multiple causes of action or challenges several alienations; if rejection is justified, it must operate on the plaint as a whole. The contrary view permitting partial rejection was held erroneous. A review petition against the order rejecting the plaint was examined under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and found not maintainable on the stated facts, so its dismissal was upheld. The order allowing only partial rejection was set aside, and the suit was left to proceed in accordance with the rule that plaint rejection cannot be fragmented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>