https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296995 The court dismissed the company petition as not maintainable due to the pending civil suit regarding disputed shares and the failure of the respondent/petitioner to substantiate allegations of oppression with sufficient evidence. The court emphasized that non-declaration of dividends does not amount to oppression and that the Company Law Board's jurisdiction does not extend to matters already under adjudication in civil courts. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:06:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296995 The court dismissed the company petition as not maintainable due to the pending civil suit regarding disputed shares and the failure of the respondent/petitioner to substantiate allegations of oppression with sufficient evidence. The court emphasized that non-declaration of dividends does not amount to oppression and that the Company Law Board's jurisdiction does not extend to matters already under adjudication in civil courts. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296995