https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411009 Writ petitions challenging orders of a quasi-judicial authority under a local sales tax law were required to be placed before the Single Judge under Rule 18(3) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. The roster fixed by the Chief Justice had to be read harmoniously with the Appellate Side Rules, and where any conflict arose, the rules framed under Article 225 of the Constitution prevailed. Because the proceedings did not fall within the exceptions in Rule 18(3), the office report placing the petitions before the Division Bench was overruled and the matters were directed to be listed before the learned Single Judge. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411009 Writ petitions challenging orders of a quasi-judicial authority under a local sales tax law were required to be placed before the Single Judge under Rule 18(3) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. The roster fixed by the Chief Justice had to be read harmoniously with the Appellate Side Rules, and where any conflict arose, the rules framed under Article 225 of the Constitution prevailed. Because the proceedings did not fall within the exceptions in Rule 18(3), the office report placing the petitions before the Division Bench was overruled and the matters were directed to be listed before the learned Single Judge. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411009