https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410995 The case involved M/s. Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Limited seeking an advance ruling on the appropriation of tax paid at the wrong jurisdiction and the refund of accumulated GST paid on limestone royalty under RCM. The company mistakenly paid GST on limestone royalty in Telangana instead of Andhra Pradesh. The Authority for Advance Ruling clarified that questions of appropriation of taxes and refund were outside its scope, leading to the rejection of the application under the CGST Act, 2017 and APGST Act, 2017. The company's request for a ruling on the refund of accumulated GST paid on limestone royalty under RCM was also not admitted. en-us Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410995 The case involved M/s. Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Limited seeking an advance ruling on the appropriation of tax paid at the wrong jurisdiction and the refund of accumulated GST paid on limestone royalty under RCM. The company mistakenly paid GST on limestone royalty in Telangana instead of Andhra Pradesh. The Authority for Advance Ruling clarified that questions of appropriation of taxes and refund were outside its scope, leading to the rejection of the application under the CGST Act, 2017 and APGST Act, 2017. The company's request for a ruling on the refund of accumulated GST paid on limestone royalty under RCM was also not admitted. Case-Laws GST Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410995