<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 564 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The Tribunal found no fault in the application of section 50C and accepted the valuation of the subject land for Capital Gains computation. Despite various challenges raised by the assessee, including the validity of the sale agreement and the assessment of Capital Gains, the Tribunal concurred with the lower authorities&#039; decisions. The order was pronounced on 12th August 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 564 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The Tribunal found no fault in the application of section 50C and accepted the valuation of the subject land for Capital Gains computation. Despite various challenges raised by the assessee, including the validity of the sale agreement and the assessment of Capital Gains, the Tribunal concurred with the lower authorities&#039; decisions. The order was pronounced on 12th August 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>