<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1951 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296981</link>
    <description>The court admitted the petition for hearing and ultimately directed the Competent Authority to process the petitioner&#039;s representation for &#039;One Time Settlement&#039; or loan rescheduling within two weeks by issuing a speaking order in accordance with the law. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and disposed of certain interim applications that were rendered irrelevant after the resolution of the main petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 21:22:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1951 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296981</link>
      <description>The court admitted the petition for hearing and ultimately directed the Competent Authority to process the petitioner&#039;s representation for &#039;One Time Settlement&#039; or loan rescheduling within two weeks by issuing a speaking order in accordance with the law. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and disposed of certain interim applications that were rendered irrelevant after the resolution of the main petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>