<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1912 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296980</link>
    <description>Where leave to defend was made conditional on securing the plaintiff&#039;s claim because the defence was found to be moonshine, failure to make the ordered deposit within time entitled the plaintiff to judgment. With the non-deposit certificate taken on file, the plaintiff obtained a decree for the claimed sum, further interest on the principal amount, and costs. In the commercial suit context, costs were awarded under the amended costs provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 21:22:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1912 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296980</link>
      <description>Where leave to defend was made conditional on securing the plaintiff&#039;s claim because the defence was found to be moonshine, failure to make the ordered deposit within time entitled the plaintiff to judgment. With the non-deposit certificate taken on file, the plaintiff obtained a decree for the claimed sum, further interest on the principal amount, and costs. In the commercial suit context, costs were awarded under the amended costs provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>