<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 551 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410973</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned order and directed the petitioner to comply with the pre-deposit condition within four weeks. Upon compliance, the 1st respondent was instructed to entertain and dispose of the appeal on merits, ensuring due process for all parties involved. The Writ Petition was allowed without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 551 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410973</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned order and directed the petitioner to comply with the pre-deposit condition within four weeks. Upon compliance, the 1st respondent was instructed to entertain and dispose of the appeal on merits, ensuring due process for all parties involved. The Writ Petition was allowed without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>