https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410970 The Court quashed the communication requiring a bank guarantee for provisional release of seized goods, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to take back the cargo without the bank guarantee. The Court emphasized that the demand for a bank guarantee was unnecessary in the circumstances where the petitioner sought to retrieve the goods due to order cancellation, leading to demurrage charges. The Writ Petitions were disposed of with no costs incurred, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410970 The Court quashed the communication requiring a bank guarantee for provisional release of seized goods, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to take back the cargo without the bank guarantee. The Court emphasized that the demand for a bank guarantee was unnecessary in the circumstances where the petitioner sought to retrieve the goods due to order cancellation, leading to demurrage charges. The Writ Petitions were disposed of with no costs incurred, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410970