<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 544 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410966</link>
    <description>An acknowledgment of liability and balance confirmation dated 15.07.2019 extended limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the Section 7 insolvency application filed on 28.07.2020 was not time-barred. The ex parte admission order was also upheld because notice had been issued, the corporate debtor did not file a reply or vakalatnama over two hearings, and no failure of service was shown. A COVID-related explanation for one director&#039;s absence was insufficient where the company had more than one director. The admission of the insolvency application was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 544 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410966</link>
      <description>An acknowledgment of liability and balance confirmation dated 15.07.2019 extended limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the Section 7 insolvency application filed on 28.07.2020 was not time-barred. The ex parte admission order was also upheld because notice had been issued, the corporate debtor did not file a reply or vakalatnama over two hearings, and no failure of service was shown. A COVID-related explanation for one director&#039;s absence was insufficient where the company had more than one director. The admission of the insolvency application was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>