<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 58 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26263</link>
    <description>A question of law arose on whether a fine imposed in criminal proceedings could be deducted as business expenditure under the Income-tax Act. On the Revenue&#039;s section 256(2) application, the High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s order gave rise to a referable question of law and directed the Tribunal to state a case and refer that issue for the Court&#039;s opinion. No order as to costs was made due to the assessee&#039;s non-appearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:16:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 58 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26263</link>
      <description>A question of law arose on whether a fine imposed in criminal proceedings could be deducted as business expenditure under the Income-tax Act. On the Revenue&#039;s section 256(2) application, the High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s order gave rise to a referable question of law and directed the Tribunal to state a case and refer that issue for the Court&#039;s opinion. No order as to costs was made due to the assessee&#039;s non-appearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>