https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410957 The authority ruled that it lacks jurisdiction to issue a ruling on the questions raised by the applicant as the matters fall outside the scope specified under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act and involve activities proposed by a registered person beyond its jurisdiction. The applicant's concerns stemmed from objections raised by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, further limiting the authority's jurisdiction under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act. en-us Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410957 The authority ruled that it lacks jurisdiction to issue a ruling on the questions raised by the applicant as the matters fall outside the scope specified under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act and involve activities proposed by a registered person beyond its jurisdiction. The applicant's concerns stemmed from objections raised by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, further limiting the authority's jurisdiction under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act. Case-Laws GST Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410957