<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 533 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410955</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of Distillery Dry Grains Soluble (DDGS) and Distillery Wet Grains Soluble (DWGS) under GST tax slabs. The applicant sought clarification on the HSN Code for these products, arguing against a higher tax rate. The jurisdictional officer issued a notice for a substantial tax amount, leading to the applicant seeking an advance ruling. However, the Authority for Advance Ruling rejected the application, citing procedural grounds under the CGST Act. The judgment focused on the inadmissibility of the application due to pending proceedings, without delving into the substantive merits of the case, ultimately leading to the rejection of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 533 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410955</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of Distillery Dry Grains Soluble (DDGS) and Distillery Wet Grains Soluble (DWGS) under GST tax slabs. The applicant sought clarification on the HSN Code for these products, arguing against a higher tax rate. The jurisdictional officer issued a notice for a substantial tax amount, leading to the applicant seeking an advance ruling. However, the Authority for Advance Ruling rejected the application, citing procedural grounds under the CGST Act. The judgment focused on the inadmissibility of the application due to pending proceedings, without delving into the substantive merits of the case, ultimately leading to the rejection of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>