<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 531 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410953</link>
    <description>The services provided by the applicant were deemed a composite supply of works contract under the CGST Act, 2017. The services were found taxable at a rate of 12% under a specific entry of the Central Tax (Rate) notification. The Authority ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that the services fell within the prescribed category for the concessional tax rate. The question regarding the applicable GST rate and SAC/HSN became irrelevant due to the determination on taxability at 12%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 531 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410953</link>
      <description>The services provided by the applicant were deemed a composite supply of works contract under the CGST Act, 2017. The services were found taxable at a rate of 12% under a specific entry of the Central Tax (Rate) notification. The Authority ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that the services fell within the prescribed category for the concessional tax rate. The question regarding the applicable GST rate and SAC/HSN became irrelevant due to the determination on taxability at 12%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>