<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 521 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410943</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in filing an appeal was considered on the ground of a 520-day delay. The legal basis applied was the requirement of a satisfactory explanation for delay; no such explanation was found, resulting in dismissal of the condonation application and the appeal not being entertained. The operative effect is that excessive unexplained delay defeats leave to appeal and the filing is barred on procedural limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 521 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410943</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in filing an appeal was considered on the ground of a 520-day delay. The legal basis applied was the requirement of a satisfactory explanation for delay; no such explanation was found, resulting in dismissal of the condonation application and the appeal not being entertained. The operative effect is that excessive unexplained delay defeats leave to appeal and the filing is barred on procedural limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>