<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 512 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410934</link>
    <description>The Court declined to intervene in the ongoing proceedings regarding the blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the Department, emphasizing the need for adjudication based on evidence. The petitioner was advised to address concerns before competent authorities for a prompt resolution. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, highlighting the importance of following due process and allowing authorities to conclude the matter efficiently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 512 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410934</link>
      <description>The Court declined to intervene in the ongoing proceedings regarding the blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the Department, emphasizing the need for adjudication based on evidence. The petitioner was advised to address concerns before competent authorities for a prompt resolution. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, highlighting the importance of following due process and allowing authorities to conclude the matter efficiently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>