<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the adjustments to the balance-sheet for assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67, favoring the assessee. Municipal valuation was considered as the annual letting value for properties, also in favor of the assessee. The High Court determined that the right acquired under agreements to sell did not create a capital asset, following previous decisions. Ultimately, all issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, leading to no costs being ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:57:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the adjustments to the balance-sheet for assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67, favoring the assessee. Municipal valuation was considered as the annual letting value for properties, also in favor of the assessee. The High Court determined that the right acquired under agreements to sell did not create a capital asset, following previous decisions. Ultimately, all issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, leading to no costs being ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>