<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26251</link>
    <description>Section 271(1) fixes liability and section 271(2) prescribes a special computation rule for registered firms: once penalty is attracted under section 271(1), it must be computed as if the firm were unregistered. A nil figure on computation as a registered firm does not extinguish the penalty liability. The issue was therefore answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26251</link>
      <description>Section 271(1) fixes liability and section 271(2) prescribes a special computation rule for registered firms: once penalty is attracted under section 271(1), it must be computed as if the firm were unregistered. A nil figure on computation as a registered firm does not extinguish the penalty liability. The issue was therefore answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>