https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410899 The Madras HC held that the Vice President's appointment to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not invalid merely because it was made on 22.01.2020. Reading the Supreme Court's interim directions in the tribunal reform litigation with the parent Acts and Rules, the Court found that those directions were intended to govern all appointments made before the 2020 Rules came into force. The Selection Committee minutes also showed that the appointment process followed those interim directions and applied the then-existing statutory framework. The challenge therefore failed and the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410899 The Madras HC held that the Vice President's appointment to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not invalid merely because it was made on 22.01.2020. Reading the Supreme Court's interim directions in the tribunal reform litigation with the parent Acts and Rules, the Court found that those directions were intended to govern all appointments made before the 2020 Rules came into force. The Selection Committee minutes also showed that the appointment process followed those interim directions and applied the then-existing statutory framework. The challenge therefore failed and the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410899