https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410898 The accused was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the lack of substantial evidence and credible testimony regarding the alleged loan transaction. Both the Trial Court and Sessions Judge's Court were criticized for not considering the absence of documentation and inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, leading to the overturning of their judgments. en-us Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:40:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410898 The accused was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the lack of substantial evidence and credible testimony regarding the alleged loan transaction. Both the Trial Court and Sessions Judge's Court were criticized for not considering the absence of documentation and inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, leading to the overturning of their judgments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410898