<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410890</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for various assessment years due to the lack of specific charges in the penalty notices and assessment orders. The tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear specification of charges, citing judicial precedents. Consequently, the tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalties for all the relevant assessment years, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410890</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for various assessment years due to the lack of specific charges in the penalty notices and assessment orders. The tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear specification of charges, citing judicial precedents. Consequently, the tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalties for all the relevant assessment years, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>