<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 463 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee. It ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act, stating that the business transaction amount cannot be treated as deemed dividend. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of car expenses due to insufficient contestation by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:40:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 463 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee. It ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act, stating that the business transaction amount cannot be treated as deemed dividend. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of car expenses due to insufficient contestation by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>