<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1006 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296932</link>
    <description>The writ petition was dismissed after the respondent informed the HC that the order dated 17.11.2020 had already been passed in compliance with the earlier direction. The Court left the petitioner at liberty to pursue the remedy available in law against that order, so the dispute was not examined further in the writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1006 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296932</link>
      <description>The writ petition was dismissed after the respondent informed the HC that the order dated 17.11.2020 had already been passed in compliance with the earlier direction. The Court left the petitioner at liberty to pursue the remedy available in law against that order, so the dispute was not examined further in the writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>