https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296929 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting a patent error, discovery of new material, or similar narrow grounds, and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. A reference to "State Government" instead of "Registrar" in the earlier order was treated as a typographical error, so only limited rectification was warranted and the merits were not reopened. The earlier Division Bench ruling on wage settlements and Rule 149 was held to have determined the governing statutory position for co-operative societies, making it binding precedent rather than obiter dicta. The challenge to the writ appeal order was rejected and the writ appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:23:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296929 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting a patent error, discovery of new material, or similar narrow grounds, and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. A reference to "State Government" instead of "Registrar" in the earlier order was treated as a typographical error, so only limited rectification was warranted and the merits were not reopened. The earlier Division Bench ruling on wage settlements and Rule 149 was held to have determined the governing statutory position for co-operative societies, making it binding precedent rather than obiter dicta. The challenge to the writ appeal order was rejected and the writ appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296929