<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296933</link>
    <description>Government land under a registered agreement showing only permissive use by a spinning mill could not be treated as the mill&#039;s asset for recovery of commercial tax arrears, so the Commercial Tax Department had no basis to auction it. The auction cancellation was upheld as legally valid, and the bidder&#039;s request for confirmation of sale failed. As the bid amount had not been refunded, return of the bid money with interest at prevailing bank rates was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296933</link>
      <description>Government land under a registered agreement showing only permissive use by a spinning mill could not be treated as the mill&#039;s asset for recovery of commercial tax arrears, so the Commercial Tax Department had no basis to auction it. The auction cancellation was upheld as legally valid, and the bidder&#039;s request for confirmation of sale failed. As the bid amount had not been refunded, return of the bid money with interest at prevailing bank rates was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>