https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296917 A month-to-month tenancy was governed by rent payable according to the English calendar month, so the termination notice had to be tested against the pleadings and admissions rather than an unregistered tenancy agreement. The tenant had admitted the monthly tenancy and did not dispute the pleaded basis for the tenancy month. The unregistered agreement could not override that admission. On that footing, service of notice on 15 January 2000 left a clear month ending with February 2000 and met the statutory requirement, so the notice validly determined the tenancy. en-us Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:48:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296917 A month-to-month tenancy was governed by rent payable according to the English calendar month, so the termination notice had to be tested against the pleadings and admissions rather than an unregistered tenancy agreement. The tenant had admitted the monthly tenancy and did not dispute the pleaded basis for the tenancy month. The unregistered agreement could not override that admission. On that footing, service of notice on 15 January 2000 left a clear month ending with February 2000 and met the statutory requirement, so the notice validly determined the tenancy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296917