<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296915</link>
    <description>Registrar directions under Section 181 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 were treated as valid exercises of statutory power to issue binding instructions in public interest and for proper management of co-operative societies. Rule 149 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988 was read as supporting regulation of service conditions and pay scales, so the consequential orders cancelling settlements contrary to those directions were held to be in conformity with the statutory framework. The earlier Division Bench decision was not treated as preventing resort to lawful statutory process, and the unchallenged original directions supported maintainability of the consequential orders under Section 166.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296915</link>
      <description>Registrar directions under Section 181 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 were treated as valid exercises of statutory power to issue binding instructions in public interest and for proper management of co-operative societies. Rule 149 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988 was read as supporting regulation of service conditions and pay scales, so the consequential orders cancelling settlements contrary to those directions were held to be in conformity with the statutory framework. The earlier Division Bench decision was not treated as preventing resort to lawful statutory process, and the unchallenged original directions supported maintainability of the consequential orders under Section 166.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>