<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 444 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410866</link>
    <description>A registering officer cannot refuse registration of a sale certificate on grounds of title, marketable title, or Sales Tax encumbrance because registration under the Registration Act is an administrative function and not an adjudication of title. A sale certificate issued to a purchaser at public auction is excluded from compulsory registration under Section 17(2)(xii), and reliance on Section 22-A was no longer available. Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Registration Rules applies only where an express statutory prohibition exists and the required permission or no-objection certificate is absent; no such prohibition was shown. The secured creditor&#039;s statutory priority under Section 26-E prevails over State VAT dues, and refusal of registration on that basis was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 444 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410866</link>
      <description>A registering officer cannot refuse registration of a sale certificate on grounds of title, marketable title, or Sales Tax encumbrance because registration under the Registration Act is an administrative function and not an adjudication of title. A sale certificate issued to a purchaser at public auction is excluded from compulsory registration under Section 17(2)(xii), and reliance on Section 22-A was no longer available. Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Registration Rules applies only where an express statutory prohibition exists and the required permission or no-objection certificate is absent; no such prohibition was shown. The secured creditor&#039;s statutory priority under Section 26-E prevails over State VAT dues, and refusal of registration on that basis was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>