<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 440 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410862</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed the validity of the notice under Section 148, the application of Section 2(22)(e) concerning deemed dividend, and the assessment of loans received by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of factual evidence and thorough consideration of all relevant material in tax assessment cases, remitting the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision based on all available records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:21:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 440 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410862</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed the validity of the notice under Section 148, the application of Section 2(22)(e) concerning deemed dividend, and the assessment of loans received by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of factual evidence and thorough consideration of all relevant material in tax assessment cases, remitting the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision based on all available records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>