<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 25 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26239</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the applications under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It held that the assessments on the bigger Hindu undivided family were justified, despite notices being issued to the smaller Hindu undivided family. The Court emphasized that in the absence of factual controversy, the assessments were valid, and fresh notices should have been issued if wealth assessable in the bigger family had escaped assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 25 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26239</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the applications under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It held that the assessments on the bigger Hindu undivided family were justified, despite notices being issued to the smaller Hindu undivided family. The Court emphasized that in the absence of factual controversy, the assessments were valid, and fresh notices should have been issued if wealth assessable in the bigger family had escaped assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>