https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410858 The Court dismissed the challenge to Assistant Commissioner's orders on duty rebate eligibility for a cotton yarn exporter, emphasizing ineligibility for both duty rebate and drawback to prevent double benefits. It clarified the distinct rules governing rebates and drawbacks, rejecting the petitioner's claim based on previous precedent. Stressing the importance of exhausting statutory appeals before resorting to Writ Petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to follow the appeal process for due consideration. Emphasizing the expertise of appellate forums in fact-finding, the judgment underscored the significance of adhering to prescribed procedures for comprehensive justice. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410858 The Court dismissed the challenge to Assistant Commissioner's orders on duty rebate eligibility for a cotton yarn exporter, emphasizing ineligibility for both duty rebate and drawback to prevent double benefits. It clarified the distinct rules governing rebates and drawbacks, rejecting the petitioner's claim based on previous precedent. Stressing the importance of exhausting statutory appeals before resorting to Writ Petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to follow the appeal process for due consideration. Emphasizing the expertise of appellate forums in fact-finding, the judgment underscored the significance of adhering to prescribed procedures for comprehensive justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410858