<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 431 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410853</link>
    <description>Once CIRP and the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code commenced, cargo treated as belonging to the corporate debtor could not be auctioned by customs outside the insolvency framework. The Code prevailed over inconsistent customs ures, so the auction sale proceeds had to be dealt with in the insolvency proceedings. The customs department&#039;s dues were characterised as statutory claims falling within the position of an operational creditor, and the penalty imposed for non-compliance with the earlier release direction was set aside. The department was left to pursue its claim through the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 431 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410853</link>
      <description>Once CIRP and the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code commenced, cargo treated as belonging to the corporate debtor could not be auctioned by customs outside the insolvency framework. The Code prevailed over inconsistent customs ures, so the auction sale proceeds had to be dealt with in the insolvency proceedings. The customs department&#039;s dues were characterised as statutory claims falling within the position of an operational creditor, and the penalty imposed for non-compliance with the earlier release direction was set aside. The department was left to pursue its claim through the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>