https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410838 Service of a section 8 demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as valid when delivered at the corporate debtor's corporate office and other regular business addresses, even though it was not sent to the registered office. However, an application under section 9 could not be admitted because the operational creditor did not establish the outstanding debt and default on the record; the corporate debtor disputed the amounts and asserted excess payment and full and final settlement, and those assertions were not specifically rebutted. The application was therefore dismissed for want of proof of debt and default. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:20:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410838 Service of a section 8 demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as valid when delivered at the corporate debtor's corporate office and other regular business addresses, even though it was not sent to the registered office. However, an application under section 9 could not be admitted because the operational creditor did not establish the outstanding debt and default on the record; the corporate debtor disputed the amounts and asserted excess payment and full and final settlement, and those assertions were not specifically rebutted. The application was therefore dismissed for want of proof of debt and default. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410838