<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2079 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296900</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, remanding the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal found that the evidence presented was not adequately considered by the Revenue authorities, emphasizing the need to ensure the principles of natural justice in the assessment process. The decision granted the assessee an opportunity for a fair hearing in accordance with these principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:18:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2079 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296900</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, remanding the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal found that the evidence presented was not adequately considered by the Revenue authorities, emphasizing the need to ensure the principles of natural justice in the assessment process. The decision granted the assessee an opportunity for a fair hearing in accordance with these principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>