<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 501 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296893</link>
    <description>Unauthorised retention of government accommodation after expiry of the permitted period attracts damages at market rent under the allotment rules. Liability does not depend on a further notice, and administrative inaction cannot establish relaxation, which requires a specific reasoned order; promissory estoppel requires an inducing governmental representation and change of position. Commuted pension remains pension money due until paid and is protected from unilateral deduction for government dues under the Pensions Act. Damages for unauthorised occupation must therefore be recovered through proceedings under the Public Premises Act or a civil suit, rather than by deduction from commuted pension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 501 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296893</link>
      <description>Unauthorised retention of government accommodation after expiry of the permitted period attracts damages at market rent under the allotment rules. Liability does not depend on a further notice, and administrative inaction cannot establish relaxation, which requires a specific reasoned order; promissory estoppel requires an inducing governmental representation and change of position. Commuted pension remains pension money due until paid and is protected from unilateral deduction for government dues under the Pensions Act. Damages for unauthorised occupation must therefore be recovered through proceedings under the Public Premises Act or a civil suit, rather than by deduction from commuted pension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>