<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 501 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296893</link>
    <description>Liability for damages at market rent for unauthorised retention of government accommodation arises once the allotment stands cancelled and the occupant remains in unlawful possession; it is not dependent on a further notice, and cannot be avoided by presumed relaxation or promissory estoppel. Relaxation under the allotment rules requires a specific order with recorded reasons. The article also notes that commuted pension retains the character of pension money until payment, so it is protected from attachment and cannot be unilaterally reduced to recover Government dues. Recovery must be pursued through lawful statutory proceedings or a civil suit, and any unauthorised deduction is refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 501 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296893</link>
      <description>Liability for damages at market rent for unauthorised retention of government accommodation arises once the allotment stands cancelled and the occupant remains in unlawful possession; it is not dependent on a further notice, and cannot be avoided by presumed relaxation or promissory estoppel. Relaxation under the allotment rules requires a specific order with recorded reasons. The article also notes that commuted pension retains the character of pension money until payment, so it is protected from attachment and cannot be unilaterally reduced to recover Government dues. Recovery must be pursued through lawful statutory proceedings or a civil suit, and any unauthorised deduction is refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>