<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 30 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the shops in question were gifted to the daughter of the deceased owner, not the assessee. Consequently, the shops were not included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth for the assessment year. The High Court upheld this factual determination, stating that no legal question arose from the Tribunal&#039;s decision, and dismissed the application for reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:04:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 30 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the shops in question were gifted to the daughter of the deceased owner, not the assessee. Consequently, the shops were not included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth for the assessment year. The High Court upheld this factual determination, stating that no legal question arose from the Tribunal&#039;s decision, and dismissed the application for reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>