https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296885 Dismissal of a summons complaint for the complainant's non-appearance under Section 256 CrPC operates as an acquittal of the accused. The Magistrate has no express or inherent power to recall or restore such an order once passed. Where the Code provides a statutory remedy against the resulting acquittal, inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to bypass that remedy or revive the complaint. The restoration request was therefore not maintainable before the Magistrate, and inherent interference was not available. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:24:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296885 Dismissal of a summons complaint for the complainant's non-appearance under Section 256 CrPC operates as an acquittal of the accused. The Magistrate has no express or inherent power to recall or restore such an order once passed. Where the Code provides a statutory remedy against the resulting acquittal, inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to bypass that remedy or revive the complaint. The restoration request was therefore not maintainable before the Magistrate, and inherent interference was not available. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296885