<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 409 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410831</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the cancellation of registration under the CGST Act, emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed procedures. The Court directed the proper officer to consider the application for revocation of cancellation if filed within 15 days and decide on the merits within 30 days from the date of filing, highlighting the significance of adhering to timelines in seeking revocation of registration cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 409 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410831</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the cancellation of registration under the CGST Act, emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed procedures. The Court directed the proper officer to consider the application for revocation of cancellation if filed within 15 days and decide on the merits within 30 days from the date of filing, highlighting the significance of adhering to timelines in seeking revocation of registration cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>