<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1004 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296880</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of an order on pay fixation and entitlement to arrears of increment and pension revision for employees appointed to Selection Grade. The petitioner&#039;s significant delay in approaching the court, waiting several years after a colleague&#039;s case concluded, led to the dismissal. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal action, especially in matters affecting service rights, the court highlighted that delayed petitions based on past cases set a problematic precedent and discourage prompt dispute resolution. The petitioner&#039;s prolonged inaction precluded relief, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:58:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1004 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296880</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of an order on pay fixation and entitlement to arrears of increment and pension revision for employees appointed to Selection Grade. The petitioner&#039;s significant delay in approaching the court, waiting several years after a colleague&#039;s case concluded, led to the dismissal. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal action, especially in matters affecting service rights, the court highlighted that delayed petitions based on past cases set a problematic precedent and discourage prompt dispute resolution. The petitioner&#039;s prolonged inaction precluded relief, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>