https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410807 An emergency arbitrator's interim relief under institutional arbitration rules was held to fall within Section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 because party autonomy, broad definitions of arbitration and arbitral tribunal, and the phrase "during the arbitral proceedings" extend to emergency arbitration before constitution of the main tribunal. The resulting order is enforceable under Section 17(2) as if it were a court order. The Court further held that Section 37 is a complete appeal code for the Act, and the legal fiction in Section 17(2) does not create a separate appeal under the CPC. No appeal lies under Section 37 or Order XLIII Rule 1(r) against enforcement of such emergency award. en-us Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:57:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410807 An emergency arbitrator's interim relief under institutional arbitration rules was held to fall within Section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 because party autonomy, broad definitions of arbitration and arbitral tribunal, and the phrase "during the arbitral proceedings" extend to emergency arbitration before constitution of the main tribunal. The resulting order is enforceable under Section 17(2) as if it were a court order. The Court further held that Section 37 is a complete appeal code for the Act, and the legal fiction in Section 17(2) does not create a separate appeal under the CPC. No appeal lies under Section 37 or Order XLIII Rule 1(r) against enforcement of such emergency award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410807