<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 384 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410806</link>
    <description>The court refused an adjournment for filing additional documents as it had been previously adjourned for the same reason. The court noted that fantasy sports were not considered gambling but games of skill, dismissing similar matters previously. Special Leave Petitions from Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and Bombay High Court were dismissed, indicating a settled issue. In a Bombay High Court case, the Union and State of Maharashtra were not heard, leading to a stay of judgment. The current Special Leave Petition was dismissed due to past dismissals and the distinct nature of the Union and State matter. The application to intervene was not addressed, with directions to move it before the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 384 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410806</link>
      <description>The court refused an adjournment for filing additional documents as it had been previously adjourned for the same reason. The court noted that fantasy sports were not considered gambling but games of skill, dismissing similar matters previously. Special Leave Petitions from Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and Bombay High Court were dismissed, indicating a settled issue. In a Bombay High Court case, the Union and State of Maharashtra were not heard, leading to a stay of judgment. The current Special Leave Petition was dismissed due to past dismissals and the distinct nature of the Union and State matter. The application to intervene was not addressed, with directions to move it before the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>