<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 383 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410805</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a public company, in a case concerning the withholding of refunds under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the necessity for the Assessing Officer to apply their mind judiciously, record reasons for withholding refunds, and follow statutory procedures. It highlighted the right to judicial review of such actions and stressed the importance of transparency and compliance with legal requirements. The respondents were directed to refund the withheld amount for the assessment year 2018-19 to the petitioner with additional interest, underscoring the significance of procedural adherence and valid justifications for refund withholdings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:57:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 383 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410805</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a public company, in a case concerning the withholding of refunds under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the necessity for the Assessing Officer to apply their mind judiciously, record reasons for withholding refunds, and follow statutory procedures. It highlighted the right to judicial review of such actions and stressed the importance of transparency and compliance with legal requirements. The respondents were directed to refund the withheld amount for the assessment year 2018-19 to the petitioner with additional interest, underscoring the significance of procedural adherence and valid justifications for refund withholdings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>