<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 21 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26219</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in admitting additional evidence unrelated to the main issue of partnership genuineness. The Court directed the Tribunal to refer specific questions on the jurisdiction to permit new evidence and raise new pleas for the Court&#039;s opinion. This decision emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 21 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26219</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in admitting additional evidence unrelated to the main issue of partnership genuineness. The Court directed the Tribunal to refer specific questions on the jurisdiction to permit new evidence and raise new pleas for the Court&#039;s opinion. This decision emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>