https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296863 The Tribunal found the petitioner's requisition notice for an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) valid under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013, and held that the respondent company's modifications were illegal. The Tribunal allowed the petitioner's company petition, set aside the respondent's notice, and directed the Board to convene the EGM within 30 days as per the original requisition notice. An observer and a permanent invitee were appointed to oversee the EGM and protect minority shareholders' interests, emphasizing shareholders' supremacy in corporate governance. en-us Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Aug 2021 20:38:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296863 The Tribunal found the petitioner's requisition notice for an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) valid under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013, and held that the respondent company's modifications were illegal. The Tribunal allowed the petitioner's company petition, set aside the respondent's notice, and directed the Board to convene the EGM within 30 days as per the original requisition notice. An observer and a permanent invitee were appointed to oversee the EGM and protect minority shareholders' interests, emphasizing shareholders' supremacy in corporate governance. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296863