<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1414 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296875</link>
    <description>The court set aside the assessment proceedings for specific years, remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, and directed the petitioner to file objections within two weeks. The respondent was instructed to decide the matter afresh, considering the objections and providing a personal hearing to the petitioner. The court disposed of the Writ Petitions without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 20:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1414 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296875</link>
      <description>The court set aside the assessment proceedings for specific years, remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, and directed the petitioner to file objections within two weeks. The respondent was instructed to decide the matter afresh, considering the objections and providing a personal hearing to the petitioner. The court disposed of the Writ Petitions without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>