<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (9) TMI 123 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296848</link>
    <description>Section 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 is explained as a remedial protection against arrest for sums recoverable under the Act, including government loans recoverable under the Act and Rules. The expression &quot;sums due under this Act&quot; is given a purposive meaning covering amounts payable and recoverable within the statutory scheme, because a narrow reading would defeat the rehabilitation object. The Rules made under Section 40 are treated as part of that framework. The Act is also described as a valid Central law in the concurrent field, and Section 30 prevails over inconsistent recovery provisions in the Land Improvement Loans Act, 1883 and the Agriculturists&#039; Loans Act, 1884.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=652108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (9) TMI 123 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296848</link>
      <description>Section 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 is explained as a remedial protection against arrest for sums recoverable under the Act, including government loans recoverable under the Act and Rules. The expression &quot;sums due under this Act&quot; is given a purposive meaning covering amounts payable and recoverable within the statutory scheme, because a narrow reading would defeat the rehabilitation object. The Rules made under Section 40 are treated as part of that framework. The Act is also described as a valid Central law in the concurrent field, and Section 30 prevails over inconsistent recovery provisions in the Land Improvement Loans Act, 1883 and the Agriculturists&#039; Loans Act, 1884.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>